Financial Crisis Caused by Politicians, Not Markets
Read John Morgan’s letter to The Capital Times (Madison, WI) HERE:
‘Perhaps next economic system will work for all’:
“Dear Editor:
The meteor of toxic mortgage slammed into Earth and the dinosaurs of Wall Street are biting the dust.
The invisible hand of the free market clenched itself into a fist and beat up the market, then held itself out for a government loan.
After the economics books are rewritten, maybe Adam Smith will be taken off his pedestal, and maybe someone will invent an economic system that works for everyone, not just the favored.
Maybe cooperation and benevolence are a better foundation for economics than competition and greed.”
Comment
It’s not a new ‘economic system’ that we need – Adam Smith did not invent one; he observed what was going on around him in the 18th century and reported on it in Wealth Of Nations.
Adam Smith did not discover ‘the invisible hand of the free market’ – that is a myth. His use of the well known 18th-century-metaphor – widely used in literature at the time, and far back into classical times (it’s in Shakespeare too) was not even about markets and how they work, which he fully explained elsewhere in Books I and II in Wealth Of Nations without mentioning anything about invisible hands.
There is no need to ‘rewrite’ the ‘economics’ book. The first task is to read Wealth of Nations for the very first time in the case of 98+ per cent of working economists today, and not just rely on isolated quotations torn from its context and spread about with the authority of modern ‘top’ economists, including some Nobel Prize winners.
Many of them would be surprised that Adam Smith never advocated ‘greed’, nor gave a free pass, all areas, to businesses to do whatever their self-interested owners regarded as a sufficient reason, under the illusion that they were blessed by a mystical, implicitly religious’ force of an invisible hand, irrespective of the obvious flaws in such a ‘theory’ (‘pusillanimous superstition’, as Adam Smith described belief in such phenomena).
Legislators on both Britain and the US were complicit in the behaviours that brought the finance system into its current crisis; for political ends they punted the socially attractive notion of lending money to people unable to sustain re-payments and disregarded the standards of prudence they claimed for their economic management. Governments caused the crisis, not Adam Smith, nor anything alleged to have been written in Wealth Of Nations.
‘Perhaps next economic system will work for all’:
“Dear Editor:
The meteor of toxic mortgage slammed into Earth and the dinosaurs of Wall Street are biting the dust.
The invisible hand of the free market clenched itself into a fist and beat up the market, then held itself out for a government loan.
After the economics books are rewritten, maybe Adam Smith will be taken off his pedestal, and maybe someone will invent an economic system that works for everyone, not just the favored.
Maybe cooperation and benevolence are a better foundation for economics than competition and greed.”
Comment
It’s not a new ‘economic system’ that we need – Adam Smith did not invent one; he observed what was going on around him in the 18th century and reported on it in Wealth Of Nations.
Adam Smith did not discover ‘the invisible hand of the free market’ – that is a myth. His use of the well known 18th-century-metaphor – widely used in literature at the time, and far back into classical times (it’s in Shakespeare too) was not even about markets and how they work, which he fully explained elsewhere in Books I and II in Wealth Of Nations without mentioning anything about invisible hands.
There is no need to ‘rewrite’ the ‘economics’ book. The first task is to read Wealth of Nations for the very first time in the case of 98+ per cent of working economists today, and not just rely on isolated quotations torn from its context and spread about with the authority of modern ‘top’ economists, including some Nobel Prize winners.
Many of them would be surprised that Adam Smith never advocated ‘greed’, nor gave a free pass, all areas, to businesses to do whatever their self-interested owners regarded as a sufficient reason, under the illusion that they were blessed by a mystical, implicitly religious’ force of an invisible hand, irrespective of the obvious flaws in such a ‘theory’ (‘pusillanimous superstition’, as Adam Smith described belief in such phenomena).
Legislators on both Britain and the US were complicit in the behaviours that brought the finance system into its current crisis; for political ends they punted the socially attractive notion of lending money to people unable to sustain re-payments and disregarded the standards of prudence they claimed for their economic management. Governments caused the crisis, not Adam Smith, nor anything alleged to have been written in Wealth Of Nations.

2 Comments:
情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣,情趣用品,情趣用品,情趣,情趣,A片,A片,情色,A片,A片,情色,A片,A片,情趣用品,A片,情趣用品,A片,情趣用品,a片,情趣用品
A片,A片,AV女優,色情,成人,做愛,情色,AIO,視訊聊天室,SEX,聊天室,自拍,AV,情色,成人,情色,aio,sex,成人,情色
免費A片,美女視訊,情色交友,免費AV,色情網站,辣妹視訊,美女交友,色情影片,成人影片,成人網站,H漫,18成人,成人圖片,成人漫畫,情色網,日本A片,免費A片下載,性愛
情色文學,色情A片,A片下載,色情遊戲,色情影片,色情聊天室,情色電影,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,免費視訊聊天室,一葉情貼圖片區,情色視訊,免費成人影片,視訊交友,視訊聊天,言情小說,愛情小說,AV片,A漫,AVDVD,情色論壇,視訊美女,AV成人網,成人交友,成人電影,成人貼圖,成人小說,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人遊戲,愛情公寓,情色貼圖,色情小說,情色小說,成人論壇
情色文學,色情小說,情色小說,色情,寄情築園小遊戲,情色電影,aio,av女優,AV,免費A片,日本a片,美女視訊,辣妹視訊,聊天室,美女交友,成人光碟
A片,A片,A片下載,做愛,成人電影,.18成人,日本A片,情色小說,情色電影,成人影城,自拍,情色論壇,成人論壇,情色貼圖,情色,免費A片,成人,成人網站,成人圖片,AV女優,成人光碟,色情,色情影片,免費A片下載,SEX,AV,色情網站,本土自拍,性愛,成人影片,情色文學,成人文章,成人圖片區,成人貼圖
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店經紀,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店工作,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
專業酒店經紀,
合法酒店經紀,
酒店暑假打工,
酒店寒假打工,
酒店經紀人,
菲梵酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
禮服酒店上班,
酒店小姐兼職,
便服酒店工作,
酒店打工經紀,
制服酒店經紀,
酒店經紀,
菲
梵,
Post a Comment
<< Home